Why Sequels Are Never As Good…Or Are They?

It’s true. Sequels get a bad rep.

We all love the first book in the series. We review it, we take pictures of it, and then when the second book comes around, everything goes downhill.

But why? What about the poor sequel over there? I’ve been thinking about this topic a lot lately, so I decided to write a post on why the second book is “never good enough.”

Cover Sequel

There are, truth be told, a multitude of reasons everyone has heard of Anne of Green Gables but I bet you 3/4 of the population can’t name the next couple of books after it.

First of all, it’s hard to live up to an amazing book. When an author writes a wonderful, fabulous, marvelous book, the world of readers go crazy. We blog about it, we buy it for everyone we know (well, kind of), we ship its characters, we fangirl over it.

And when we hear there’s a sequel coming, we go even crazier! We preorder and reread the first book and get so excited!!

So when the first book was a little better, there’s a giant letdown. The first book was so much better! I loved the first book! The first book was the best! The sequel just couldn’t live up its preceder, and therefore it doesn’t become as well-known.

arrow

Secondly, sometimes the introduction to the “world” is the best part of the reading experience. Often, the first book is considered better just because it’s the one where you first fall in love with the setting, characters, and storyline.

i love magic

I’m sure some people feel this way about the Harry Potter series. I personally believe the rest of the books completely enhanced the reading experience (and maybe even improved it?), but I can see how the first book would be the best. You’d get to meet Harry, Ron, and Hermione, see Hogwarts for the first time….

arrow

Third: accidental, or unplanned, sequels can sometimes seem a little forced. Forced books definitely aren’t fun to read. Meaning people would enjoy the first book better.

I feel like sometimes authors tie up the story really nicely. The mean girl becomes friends with the nice girl, the good defeats bad, etc, etc. It seems like the plot can’t really thicken anymore and there won’t be any follow-up books.

And then the author writes another book.

Suddenly, things feel forced. There now has to be a problem so the story can keep moving along. But there doesn’t have to be an issue?! Can’t this town/family/universe just live happily ever after?! :/

arrow

We readers can be picky people. We like our books the way we like them. We like ____ to end up with ___, ___ to be win, and _____ to get turned into a rotten eggplant.

If the sequel messes with our perfect idea of what is supposed to happen, things are going to get messy. (Except since it’s just a book, “getting messy” means we’ll frown and say that we like the first book better.)

mcgonagall

I’m really into the Harry Potter gifs today. I just love McGonagall’s head shake of disapproval. 😉

arrow

I also want to point out that this isn’t always the case. Sequels aren’t always considered second-best. In fact, I can think of quite a few series where (in my personal opinion) the books just continue to get better and better.

Slight Disclaimer: all the series listed above happen to be a few of my favorites. So obviously I’d say that I love them! 😀

Favorite books aside, I have noticed a recurring theme of sequels getting a bad rep. However, I’m definitely not saying that sequels can’t be as good as the first book, or that I always think that way!

arrow

Thanks for reading! Before you go, I just want to remind you that I am having a Q&A on September 25th! If you’d like to ask any questions, go comment them on this post. 🙂

What do you think? Have you noticed that sequels don’t seem to always get the same hype as the first book? Why do you think that is? I’d love to chat with you in the comments. See you there!

signature

18 thoughts on “Why Sequels Are Never As Good…Or Are They?

  1. I don’t think all sequels are necessarily worse, but some of them DO suffer from the dreaded Middle Book Syndrome– aka the plot moves SLOW as molasses and the characters undergo no development whatsoever. Dx However, I agree that when sequels aren’t planned, they can sometimes feel “forced”?

    ALSO: omg Percy Jackson 😻😻I also adored the Mysterious Benedict Society; it was my entire childhood!!

    Liked by 1 person

  2. hey I LOVE the Mother-Daughter Book Club series. I feel like it’s super underrated for some reason. I seriously don’t think I’ve met anyone who read it without me recommending it to them haha. I think that all of Sarah J. Maas’s books (2 series) get better as you keep reading. I liked A Court of Mist and Fury (book 2) better than A Court of Thorns and Roses (book 1).
    I feel like when an author (especially a new author) writes the first book they have to prove to readers/the world that they’re good, but not really as much for the second book (if you know what I mean.)
    Anyway, great post!
    xx
    Em

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Hi, Olivia! Tomorrow (8/29/2017) is Megan’s (abarefootgal.wordpress.com) birthday! I’ve been spreading the word and I thought you might want to know in case you wanted to leave her comment or something. 😉

    -Clara ❤

    Liked by 1 person

  4. AAAH I’ve read all of those series except for Harry Potter. I completely agree on Percy Jackson and The Mysterious Benedict Society. I love the other two too!

    Liked by 1 person

I'd love to hear from you- let's chat!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s